Modiv Industrial Announces Latest Portfolio Appraisal
Addresses Sale Speculation
The following is a statement from
“This year we engaged Cushman & Wakefield to conduct an appraisal of our 43 properties and to value our three fixed rate mortgages. Their estimates of value were then used to calculate our net asset value (NAV) per share as delineated in the table further below and in our accompanying 8-K filing. Our latest NAV represents the 12th independent, third-party appraisal of our portfolio of assets in the past eight years.
This latest appraisal, like the other forms of valuation of
I can already hear it being asked… ‘Halfacre (or, if you prefer, any of my past monikers*), why bother with an appraisal in the first place?’…the primary answer is simple – transparency. As we have stated before, we believe that data informs decision-making, and transparency empowers awareness. However, there is a secondary answer to that question, and it relates to some recent marketplace speculation (i.e. SeekingAlpha) that we are looking to sell the company. If it pleases you, let’s take the red pill and slide down that rabbit hole.
Wonderland –
I wish to caveat this next section by stating that my words below are not intended as guidance but simply me sharing my transparent thoughts and opinions – both historical and hypothetical. Ok, here it goes.
I believe every publicly listed company is de facto ‘for sale’ either in the open market by individual sellers, by the corporation itself issuing shares via an ATM or other offering, or, as has been speculated on SeekingAlpha – by selling to another suitor (e.g. M&A). By that definition,
As we all know, the decision to sell to, or merge with, another company is at the discretion of voting shareholders and a company’s board of directors. As both a CEO and a large individual shareholder, I believe we can systematically close the value gap over time, thereby bringing our share price closer and closer to our NAV. At the same time, I also believe that there is a real benefit of closing that value gap sooner through M&A. I have said it in the past, and I will say it again, if an external party can close the value gap of a company and offer investors something that truly reflects fair value far sooner than the alternative, then any credible M&A offer should be taken seriously.
Personally, I love M&A and I have been lucky enough to have been involved with four REIT M&A deals in my career (including the merger that initially created
Alas, no matter how creative a ‘REITmanteau’ may be, an actual REIT combination is not unlike guessing the combination of a random high school locker. Twisting back and forth, to this number and that, then yanking down on the lock to see if it opens. Unless you can get the combo just right, nothing happens. Even though portfolios, balance sheets and management teams are fungible, there are so many variables that need to line up to have a successful merger. Often price is the most common deterrent, but other times it can be ego or financing or differing visions of the future. There is nothing wrong in trying to figure out a combination lock – you never know when it might just work. I can attest that
If you look at REIT history, particularly as it relates to some of the largest REITs, you clearly see that M&A is a very natural element of this industry. It would take a paragraph to just write about all the transactions
As I previously stated, I have no knowledge today of any potential takeover transactions, but I can tell you that we do not fear it and, in fact, view any potential M&A opportunities as a valuable tool to grow a company and a tool we hope to use ourselves. Uniquely, our management team has a fair amount of career experience with M&A, such that it is a skillset that naturally combines with our innate creativity. Even though we are striving to be an acquirer, we don’t have any preconceived notion that we are immune from acquisition, nor do we have an ego that will get in the way of a good combination. If a potential merger partner will only merge with us if we rename the company
Until then, we will keep leaning our shoulder into the hard work necessary to take
Grit, grind, get it done!”
*Monikers: Having the last name Halfacre seems like a no-brainer for the real estate industry but for whatever reason the pronunciation of my surname has been routinely butchered. When I was in high school in
MODIV INDUSTRIAL, INC. | |||||||||||||
Non-GAAP Measures - Net Asset Value Per Share | |||||||||||||
Estimated as of |
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
The table below sets forth the calculation of our estimated NAV per share (unaudited) as of |
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | ||||||||||
Value | NAV Per Share | Value | NAV Per Share | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Real estate properties |
$ |
566,365,000 |
$ |
50.63 |
$ |
569,465,000 |
$ |
50.06 |
|||||
Investment in unconsolidated entity: tenant-in-common interest (a) |
|
23,180,751 |
|
2.08 |
|
19,735,103 |
|
1.74 |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
11,530,381 |
|
1.03 |
|
10,306,887 |
|
0.91 |
|||||
Interest rate swap derivative |
|
- |
|
- |
|
2,848,024 |
|
0.25 |
|||||
Other assets |
|
2,588,485 |
|
0.23 |
|
3,555,655 |
|
0.31 |
|||||
Total Assets |
$ |
603,664,617 |
$ |
53.97 |
$ |
605,910,669 |
$ |
53.27 |
|||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable |
$ |
27,964,226 |
$ |
2.50 |
$ |
28,117,749 |
$ |
2.47 |
|||||
Credit facility (at face value) |
|
250,000,000 |
|
22.35 |
|
250,000,000 |
|
21.98 |
|||||
Accrued dividends and distributions payable |
|
1,993,839 |
|
0.18 |
|
1,005,397 |
|
0.09 |
|||||
Interest rate swap derivative |
|
- |
|
- |
|
271,283 |
|
0.02 |
|||||
Other liabilities |
|
4,061,129 |
|
0.36 |
|
4,278,158 |
|
0.38 |
|||||
Total Liabilities |
|
284,019,194 |
|
25.39 |
|
283,672,587 |
|
24.94 |
|||||
Series A preferred stock |
|
50,000,000 |
|
4.47 |
|
50,000,000 |
|
4.40 |
|||||
Total estimated net asset value (b) |
$ |
269,645,423 |
$ |
24.11 |
$ |
272,238,082 |
$ |
23.93 |
|||||
Fully-diluted shares outstanding (c) |
|
11,186,101 |
|
11,375,344 |
(a) |
Reflects our approximate 72.7% interest in the Santa Clara property which includes real estate valued at |
|
(b) |
The implied cap rate of Cushman’s real estate appraised values is 6.73% and 6.93% as of |
|
(c) |
Fully-diluted shares outstanding as of |
About
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this press release, other than historical facts, may be considered forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our plans, strategies and prospects, both business and financial, including the potential for mergers and acquisitions activity. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250204763493/en/
Inquiries:
management@modiv.com
Source: